Showing posts with label Supplementry Admission after result. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Supplementry Admission after result. Show all posts

Federal Board Islamabad FBISE Inter (Part 1) 11th Class Result 2012 Announced

Friday, September 14, 2012


Federal Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, (FBISE) Islamabad announced the Intermediate Part I 11th Class annual results 2012 here on Tuesday August 13, 2012 at 11:00 AM.
Islamabad (August 13, 2012)
Federal Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, (FBISE) Islamabad declared the Intermediate Part I 11th Class annual results 2012 here on Tuesday August 13, 2012 at 11:00 AM.
ANNUAL RESULT OF HSSC-I (2012)WILL BE DECLARED ON 13/08/2012 AT 11:00 AM.
Time : 11:00 AM 

Result Successfully Uploaded.

Posts Related to Federal Board Islamabad FBISE Inter (Part 1) 11th Class Result 2012 Announced

Supplementary Admission criteria after supplimentry result university

Impacted Programs - Supplementary Admission Criteria

In the California State University, an undergraduate major or campus is designated as impacted when the number of CSU eligible applications received in the initial filing period (October 1 to November 30 for fall admission) is greater than the number that can be accommodated by the major or campus. In such instances, CSU campuses have been authorized to use supplementary admission criteria to screen applicants to these majors and/or campuses. These supplementary admission criteria may include, but are not limited to the following: 
Supplementary Admission criteria after supplimentry result university:

  • Cease accepting admission applications at the conclusion of the initial filing period;
  • Require submission of the SAT or ACT regardless of the high school grade point average;
  • Rank order first-time freshmen by eligibility index;
  • Set a higher minimum eligibility index than that required for CSU admission;
  • Review additional characteristics such as socioeconomic or educational factors, space availability in a program or major, indications of overcoming educational obstacles, or exceptional talents; and
  • Require completion of specified lower-division general education requirements for transfer applicants.

Supplementary Admissions Exercise for International Students (S-AEIS) Result

From 2012, MOE will hold a Supplementary Admissions Exercise for International Students (S-AEIS) in February / March every year. This means that there will be two exercises for admissions into a particular school calendar year, for example, in September / October 2011 and February / March 2012 for admissions into Academic Year 2012. This initiative will provide better facilitation and convenience to international students (IS) as well as streamline the administrative processes for our schools.
Since 2008, IS wishing to seek school admission to mainstream public primary and secondary schools, and who will be age 7 and above as of 1 January in the year of school admission, may take part in an annual AEIS during the September / October period every year. Under AEIS, IS enjoy the convenience of a centralised test on English and Mathematics, and an offer of a school place if they pass the test. An applicant who passes the test is offered a place in a suitable school, based on available vacancies and his performance in the centralised test. These successful applicants can start school at the beginning of the academic year in January.
Previously, IS who were unable to participate in the September / October AEIS may sit for and must pass the Qualifying Test (QT) before approaching individual schools for further school-based admissions tests. Many approach more than one school to increase their chances of admission and are often required to sit for different admission tests by the schools they are applying to. Our schools also need to cope with the additional administrative load to conduct such tests.
With the availability of the S-AEIS in February / March, there will be no more QTs from July 2011 onwards. Applicants who pass the S-AEIS will be offered a place in a suitable school with vacancies based on their S-AEIS results. IS should not approach our schools for admissions as it will be centrally managed.




Infographic for S-AEIS Process
Aligilibility :
New international students who do not have a place in a local school and who wish to seek admission into Primary 2-4 and Secondary 1-2 are eligible to take part in S-AEIS.

Application for S-AEIS

Please read the rest of this page before proceeding with the online application.

Key Events & Dates for S-AEIS

International students can apply from 2 January 2013 onwards to take part in S-AEIS and sit for the centralised test appropriate for their age cohorts. Registration for the test date will close when all available places for that test date are taken up. Applicants are therefore strongly encouraged to register early, make payment and submit the required supporting documents within one week of their online application.
Date Event Mode
2 Jan – 31 Jan 2013 Online Application for 27 Feb / 28 Feb 2013 S-AEIS test Online application and submission of supporting documents and payment
By 21 Feb 2013 Receive Entry Proof for 27 Feb / 28 Feb 2013 S-AEIS test Email
27 Feb 2013 Conduct of S-AEIS test (for Secondary Levels 1 - 2) In person
28 Feb 2013 Conduct of S-AEIS test (for Primary Levels 2 - 4) In person
15 Apr 2013 Release of school offers – Primary levels View outcomes online
16 Apr – 30 Apr 2013 International students to report to school – Primary levels In person
29 Apr 2013 Release of school offers – Secondary levels View outcomes online
30 Apr – 14 May 2013 International students to report to school – Secondary levels In person

How to apply for S-AEIS

For more information on S-AEIS application, please read the sections below before you proceed to complete the S-AEIS Online Application form. Applicants must use a valid email address in the application.

Documents required

Applicants are required to have a photocopy of the following supporting documents:
  • Applicant:
    • Birth Certificate
    • Data Page of Passport
    • Deed Poll (if any)
    • Dependant’s Pass (if any)
    • Immigration Exemption Order (if any)
    • Student’s Pass (if any)
  • Applicant’s Parents:
    • Data Page of Passport
    • Deed Poll (if any)
    • Singapore NRIC (if any)
    • Re-entry Permit (if any)
    • Employment Pass / Work Permit (if any)

Fees payable and Submission of Supporting Documents

The S-AEIS fee is S$672.00 (inclusive of GST). This fee is strictly non-refundable. Any requests for a refund will not be considered. Applicants are strongly encouraged to consider their availability for the test before applying.

Important information for Submission of Supporting Documents:

  • Submit payment and a photocopy of supporting documents within one week of online application or by the closing date of the registration period, whichever is earlier.
  • The photocopy of supporting documents submitted should be legible.
  • If the supporting documents are in other languages, an accurate English translation must accompany the photocopies.
  • All supporting documents submitted for application purposes will not be returned to applicants.
  • Incomplete applications (i.e. without photocopies of supporting documents and/or payment) will not be processed.
Applicants may make payment and submit supporting documents via one of the following modes:
Payment mode Payment details / Submission of supporting documents By Mail In Person
Credit Card / eNETS Payment by credit card / eNETS is only available online.
After submission of credit card details online, you are to submit a photocopy of your supporting documents either by mail or in person.
Business Services Division,
Centre for Assessment Training and Services (S-AEIS),
Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board,
298 Jalan Bukit Ho Swee,
Singapore 169565
Customer Service Centre,
Ministry of Education,
1 North Buona Vista Drive,
Singapore 138675
Cheque / Bank draft Applicants may issue a cheque of Singapore-based banks or a bank draft drawn on a bank in Singapore. They should be made payable to “SINGAPORE EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT BOARD”, and the cheque should be crossed.
Each S-AEIS application should be accompanied by one cheque or bank draft for $672 only.
The applicant’s name, passport number and the test level for which the applicant is applying for must be written on the reverse of the cheque / bank draft.
If you are paying by cheque / bank draft, you are to submit your payment together with a photocopy of your supporting documents either by mail or in person.
Cash / NETS If you are paying by cash / NETS, you are to submit your payment and photocopies of your supporting documents in person. N.A.

What happens after Submission of Supporting Documents

Applicants whose application and payment are in order will receive an official notification from the Singapore Examinations & Assessment Board (SEAB) within two weeks of their applications (latest by 21 Feb 2013 for the tests on 27 Feb / 28 Feb 2013). The official notification will include the S-AEIS Entry Proof (with applicant’s index number) and instructions for applicants.

Reporting for S-AEIS

The S-AEIS centralised tests will be held at
Singapore EXPO
1 EXPO Drive
Singapore 486150
The timetable is as follows:

Mathematics English
Date Level Start Time Duration Start Time Duration
27 Feb 13 (Wed) Sec 1 09:00 2 hr 15 min 14:30 2 hr 10 Min
Sec 2 09:00 2 hr 15 min 14:30 2 hr 10 Min
28 Feb 13 (Thu) P2 / P3 09:00 1 hr 50 min 14:30 1 hr
P4 09:00 2 hr 20 min 14:30 2 hr
All applicants are required to arrive 45 minutes before the start of the test, and be seated at their assigned desks at least 15 minutes before the commencement of the test with the following documents:
  • Applicant’s original passport
  • A copy of the Entry Proof issued by SEAB

Preparing for the S-AEIS

Applicants should note that English is the medium of instruction and are strongly encouraged to prepare themselves in advance of the tests.
Applicants should be familiar with the English and Mathematics syllabi of the level preceding the one they are applying for. For instance, an applicant who wishes to sit for Secondary 3 should be familiar with Secondary 2 content. An applicant who wishes to seek admission to Primary 3 and is assigned the P2 / P3 test should be familiar with Primary 1 and 2 content. An applicant who wishes to seek admission to Primary 2 and is assigned the P2 / P3 test should be familiar with Primary 1 content. Details on the syllabi can be found on the respective subject syllabus webpages.
For more information on the S-AEIS centralised tests and the test format, please see the section Information on S-AEIS Centralised Tests.
School Offer :
Applicants who pass the S-AEIS centralised test would be offered a place in a suitable school for the current academic year, primarily based on available school vacancies and the applicant’s performance in the S-AEIS test. Where possible, the school offer will take into account applicants’ intended residential area. Hence, there is no need for applicants to provide school choices. There will be no school choice and no release of test results under S-AEIS.
School transfer requests will not be entertained, as the school offer will take applicants’ performance and intended residential area into consideration. Therefore, please indicate your intended residential area carefully.
As the offer of a school place is dependent on the availability of vacancies and applicants’ test performance, admission is not guaranteed.
All the applicants, including those who are unsuccessful, will be able to view the outcomes of their school offer online on the following dates (tentative):
Level School Offer / Notification Date
Primary levels 15 Apr 2013
Secondary levels 29 Apr 2013
Successful S-AEIS applicants should prepare themselves in advance for a new school environment where English is the language of classroom instruction, and to familiarise themselves with the relevant curriculum for their level. International students who wish to undertake preparatory courses before or at the start of their entry into schools can refer to the Council for Private Education website.
Unsuccessful applicants may re-apply to take the next AEIS or S-AEIS, subject to them meeting the permissible age-ranges for the level.
The S-AEIS outcome is final. MOE will not accept any appeal requests from unsuccessful applicants.

Reporting to school

All successful applicants are to report to their offered schools during the following periods. If they are unable to, they should contact the schools to make alternative arrangements.
Level Reporting and registration period
Primary levels 16 Apr 2013 to 30 Apr 2013
Secondary levels 30 Apr 2013 to 14 May 2013
Applicants who do not report to the offered schools within the periods stated above may have their places offered to other applicants.

Requirement for Student’s Pass (Important)

Successful applicants holding a Dependant’s Pass (DP) or Immigration Exemption Order (IEO) do not need to apply for a Student’s Pass (STP). Their admission can be confirmed immediately upon reporting to the offered schools.
Successful applicants without a DP or IEO should note that admission is subject to them obtaining a STP. They are advised to apply for their STP with the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) as soon as possible after reporting to school so that they can start school at the earliest possible date upon receipt of the STP.

SSLC student can take admission after supplementary exams result in punjab college

Prasanna (name changed), an SSLC student, who passed in the supplementary examinations said: "I had to appear for supplementary exams result as I could not sit for the annual exams due to poor health. But now getting a seat in a private college either in science or commerce stream has become very difficult as leading private colleges have already completed their admission process."
Deputy director, pre-university education, Rajaveera Indra, said: "The maximum intake of students per section in private colleges is 80. Since there is a demand for science and commerce stream, admissions in many private colleges are already over. The strength in government colleges is low in the district. Also the seats are not limited to 80 in government colleges. As per rules, government colleges can provide unlimited seats.
We can provide admissions to all students, who have passed in supplementary exams result. He said, 20 government colleges offer PU in science stream in the district.
St Aloysius PU college principal, Fr Elvis Lewis, said: "If deserving candidates apply in our college, we will provide seats to these students."

extended date of admissions for I PU till July 25 in Punjab university

MANGALORE: The government has extended the last date for admissions for I PU till July 25. But after the recent announcement of SSLC supplementary examination results, doubts have cropped up whether there is enough number of seats available in PU colleges for their admission. Of the 4,069 students who appeared, 1,459 students have passed in supplementary examinations in Dakshina Kannada district.
There is a huge demand for PU colleges in Dakshina Kannada from across the state but private colleges will not keep their doors open for these students. There are 179 PU colleges, which include 53 government colleges, 39 aided and 87 unaided colleges. Yet chances of students who have cleared their supplementary examinations getting admission are bleak.

Supplementary students Apply for admission after supplementry result

We cannot extend the date of online admission after a limit. Supplementary students can apply for admission during the college level counselling," higher education commissioner VS Niranjan said. However, he added that the department cannot help supplementary students if they get their results after the college level counselling. "There would be no scope of taking admission in any college across the state for such students after the conclusion of the college level counselling," he added.
The state government has been emphasising on increasing the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) both at school and higher education levels. The GER is a statistical measure used in the education sector to determine the number of students enrolled in schools and colleges.
Students appearing for the supplementary exam termed the move as unjust. "I was not well on the day of the exam and that is why I have to write the supplementary exam. However, I still have an opportunity to clear the exam through the supplementary exam. An year will be wasted for me if I my results are declared after the college level counselling," an aggrieved student, Rishi Saxena, said. When contacted, the college principals in the city also felt that supplementary students would lose a year. "By the time college level counselling starts, most of the colleges will admit students according to their strength in the first and second round counselling. I do not know what will happen if supplementary result are announced after college level counselling," MLB principal, Manjula Sharma, said.

Supplementary students in trouble as online admission won’t get extension

BHOPAL: Students appearing in the supplementary exam of Class XII are likely to waste their year in Madhya Pradesh even if they clear the supplementary exam successfully.
Reason: The higher education department has made it clear that it won't extend the dates for online admission if the supplementary results are declared after the college level counselling. The online counseling will end on July 10.

Supplementary Materials got good result. Take Admission

Supplementary Materials

While we request that the submission of supplementary credentials be kept to a minimum, there may be occasions where such credentials provide information that the standard application does not. As a result, some recommendations are detailed below. If you plan to submit supplementary credentials, please follow the instructions below instead of those in The Common Application Arts Supplement. Applicants should not submit the Common Application Arts Supplement. Please note that we specifically ask that you do not send collections of award certificates and the like and explicitly direct that you refrain from submitting your application in binders or folders.

Science and Engineering

If you have been involved in scientific research and you are interested in studying engineering or the sciences at Columbia, you are welcome to provide a 1-2 page scientific abstract for our review as a supplement to your application.

Creative and Performing Arts

Applicants should not submit The Common Application Arts Supplement. Please follow the directions below depending on your area of interest:

Musical Performance

Applicants should not submit The Common Application Arts Supplement. Students may submit an electronic supplement only via a web portal available here. Audio materials will be accepted as .mp3 files. Composition scores may be submitted as .pdf files. You will need your Common Application ID number to upload a supplement, and a processing fee of $5 will be required at the time of submission. Applicants who are eligible for a Common Application fee waiver may request that their processing fee be waived by contacting Javier Plasencia, Admissions Officer. Please note that musical supplements are not a required part of our admissions process.
Students submitting a music supplement should select two works contrasting in period and tempo. Students will choose from one of three possible types of submissions:
  • orchestral instruments (specify instrument);
  • jazz (specify instrument or composition);
  • piano, voice, non-orchestral instruments (e.g. classical guitar) or composition (score or recording of score).
We require that you also list the composer, title of the work and movement title or opus number. The total length of recordings should not exceed 20 minutes and should not include any biographical or introductory material.

Students in rare circumstances may submit two music supplements only when their talent is equally impressive in two different areas within music performance or composition.

Live auditions are not part of the admissions process, but auditions for private lessons and selective ensembles are held for enrolled students at the start of each academic year.

Candidates applying to the Columbia-Juilliard Exchange should still submit materials for Columbia faculty to assess their talent and potential.

Visual Arts

Applicants should not submit The Common Application Arts Supplement. Students may submit an electronic supplement only via a web portal available here. Digital images will be accepted as .jpg, .gif or .png files, up to 5 MB each. You will need your Common Application ID number to upload a supplement, and a processing fee of $10 will be required at the time of submission. Applicants who are eligible for a Common Application fee waiver may request that their processing fee be waived by contacting Javier Plasencia, Admissions Officer. Please note that artistic supplements are not a required part of our admissions process.
Students submitting a visual arts supplement should select up to 20 digital images that highlight the best work in their portfolio.
Live portfolio reviews are not part of the admissions process.

Architecture, Creative Writing, Dance, Drama and Theatre Arts and Film Studies

Applicants should not submit The Common Application Arts Supplement. Students are welcome to submit professional resumes that list artistic achievement. Please refrain from sending CDs, DVDs or hard copies of any materials, as they will not be reviewed. However, if samples of your work can be viewed online, please clearly indicate the relevant links in the Additional Information section of The Common Application.
Finally, please be advised that while we welcome the submission of such credentials-providing they follow the directions outlined above-and we often request that our faculty evaluate submitted supplements, we can provide no guarantee that all materials will be reviewed or evaluated, as they are not required for the admission process.

Ranking of Colleges to take admission after supplementry result

A Few Thoughts From the Dean of Admissions Jeffrey Brenzel
Every year, U.S. News & World Report, Money, and a few other national magazines publish college rankings. And every year, Yale is at or near the top of the lists. I am writing to say that there are many excellent reasons to apply to Yale, but Yale’s position in the rankings is not one of them.
Make no mistake: the publication of college rankings is a business enterprise that capitalizes on anxiety about college admissions. Ranking lists do not provide much useful information for making decisions about where you should apply. Their main flaw is obvious but worth stating: the more or less arbitrary factors that go into the ranking calculations often have little to do with what will be important to your educational experience.
I do not mean to vilify the magazines that create such lists. They merely respond to consumer demand. Rather, I would like to illustrate the hazards of relying on the rankings and to make a case for a more personal and holistic approach to deciding on your list of colleges.
To better understand the phenomenon of the rankings, it is important to look at three things: why they are so popular, what is wrong with them, and why they have a bad influence on college decision-making.

What Drives Public Interest in Rankings?

The college search process can be a formidable task of sifting through enormous amounts of information, and the stakes are high. Ranking systems have an immediate and obvious appeal: they seem to simplify making sense of complicated and confusing information.
We have also become accustomed to relying on rating systems as consumers. When buying a vacuum cleaner or a television set, we can turn to Consumer Reports, which employs testing labs, engineers, surveys, and independent experts. By these means, they are able to condense and filter a great deal of information. We’ve learned from experience that there are good reasons to trust their advice, and the college ranking lists depend on people making the assumption that they are providing a similarly useful service.   

What’s Wrong with College Rankings?

A college, however, is not a vacuum cleaner. Choosing a school is a far more personal, subjective, and ultimately expensive decision. Yet despite the greater importance and complexity of selecting a college, college rankings systems all take a far less thorough and scientific approach than Consumer Reports does when testing vacuum cleaners.
Another problem with rankings is that they allow the dominant player – U.S. News and World Report, a magazine that has actually gone defunct and exists now only as a purveyor of rankings -- to exert undue influence. A former Yale admissions officer, now working in college counseling at a high school, shared this story with me. Each year, she helps students who have just completed their junior year create a list of colleges that are a good fit with their interests, personalities, and achievements. Each summer, the students visit those schools with their families to get a first-hand look. When they return to high school in the fall, despite what they have seen on their visits and what they know about their prospects, many of the students have created new lists of their college preferences. These new lists always seem to correlate with the rankings in U.S. News. Students tend to discard excellent and appropriate colleges ranked lower in U.S. News and to add “stretch” schools that are unlikely to offer them admission. She tells me she had this experience with “truly depressing regularity.”

Why is That Bad?

Rankings promote the notion that the college you attend signals something about your place in the world. The signal translates as something like this: “People will think better of me if I attend a more highly-ranked school.” Rankings encourage students (and parents) to internalize the myth that where you go to college defines your value and determines your future success in life.
What is the reality? This country happens to have hundreds of outstanding undergraduate programs, each offering more opportunities than any student could possibly pursue over four years. It will be up to the student to make something out of those opportunities, and it will not be the school that makes something out of the student.
Meanwhile, the formulas used to rank schools are based on factors that in themselves are often irrelevant to individual students. Their composite scores reflect alumni giving rates, student-to-teacher ratios, median SAT scores, persistence to graduation, admissions selectivity and other data that provide little information about specific program strengths, honors programs or the general way in which the school lifts and supports student aspirations. The simplicity and clarity that ranking systems seem to offer are not only misleading, but can also be harmful. Rankings tend to ignore the very criteria that may be most important to an applicant, such as specific academic offerings, intellectual and social climate, ease of access to faculty, international opportunities and placement rates for careers or for graduate and professional school.
Rankings have also turned out to be bad for colleges. They encourage schools to expend resources on things that move their ranking positions rather than things that serve their students. They diminish the appeal of colleges that serve many students extremely well but do not fit the performance parameters that the rankings measure. At one lower-ranked college, for example, students without strong prior academic records may tend to make tremendous gains, while at a higher-ranked school, even better-prepared students may tend to underperform their potential. The ranking systems provide no way to find out which is which.

A Better Approach

Your high school academic record, teacher recommendations, extracurricular activities, test scores, and personal objectives will determine the range of colleges where you stand a good chance of admission. If your school has a good counseling office, you should certainly work with your college counselor to develop a reasonable sense of the different kinds of schools that lie within that range.
Then simply keep in mind that the “ranking” differences among the schools within that group are likely to matter far less to your college experience than how you yourself decide to explore and engage the opportunities available at those schools. Look at different types of schools. Big schools and small schools. Schools focused on liberal arts and schools focused on technical programs. Schools known best for high academic standards and schools known best for their entrepreneurial spirit, outstanding extracurricular activities or social life. Schools with strong programs in your area of interest. Schools with interesting international opportunities. Decide which of these things is most important to you.
As you examine different types of institutions, your own feelings and thoughts are likely to change. Before zeroing in too quickly on what you think you want, give yourself time to absorb the ways in which colleges differ. Give yourself time to change your mind as you look at very different kinds of schools.
Perhaps you feel absolutely certain of the kind of school you want to attend, and you have a list of such places where you have a reasonable chance of admission. Even so, I urge you to apply to a couple of schools that do not fit the profile, but that you find interesting for one reason or another. Why? I have often seen students respond to a college very differently once they have been admitted in the spring than they did when visiting the prior summer. Students change in some important ways during their senior year in high school as they look outward to the rest of their lives, and they learn a great deal about colleges along the way. Give yourself the option in the spring of heading in a direction you did not anticipate in the fall.
Finally, once you have finished your applications, relax. You will very probably gain admission to some of your chosen colleges. You will probably have a few campuses to revisit as you make your final selection. You will also be prepared to attend college with the understanding that its rank does not correlate with what you are going to do there and how fulfilling the experience will be. What you accomplish in college – and in the years after – will instead be a function of how well you engage the incredible variety of opportunities and challenges that college presents. 

Advice of students that want to get good result in supplement papers. want to got admission

Students commonly want to know what part of the college application “carries the most weight.” The truth is, there are many parts to your application, and together they help us discover and appreciate your particular mix of qualities. Academic criteria are important to Yale’s selective admissions process, but we look at far more than test scores and grades.
Every applicant brings something unique to the admissions committee table. Perhaps one application stands out because of sparkling recommendations, while another presents outstanding extracurricular talent; maybe your personality shines through a powerful written voice, or maybe your keen mathematical mind packs more punch. Our goal is to assemble a diverse, well-rounded freshman class, and that means admitting exceptional individuals of all types. You may find this answer unsatisfying, but we assure you that it is true: the part of the application that carries the most weight is different from applicant to applicant.
This section of our website aims to help you submit the very best application possible. We asked admissions officers to weigh in with their own thoughts on each topic and we have compiled their responses below. We know that the application process can be confusing, daunting, even overwhelming, and we hope this page proves helpful as you compile your applications, not only to Yale but to every school on your list.
  • Essays
  • Extracurriculars
  • Interviews
  • Recommendations
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Transcripts and Testing

Essay

When you write your essays and “short takes” for the Common Application and Yale’s supplement, write about something that matters to you. Use your own voice. Do not worry about making a special effort to include impressive vocabulary words or overly complex sentences. If you sound like yourself and discuss something you care about, your essay will be more effective.
We know that no one can fit an entire life story into two 500 word essays, and we don’t expect you to try. Pick two topics that will give us an idea of who you are.  It doesn’t matter which topics you choose, as long as they are meaningful to you. We have read wonderful essays on common topics and weak essays on highly unusual ones. Your perspective – the lens through which you view your topic – is far more important than the specific topic itself. In the past, students have written about family situations, ethnicity or culture, school or community events to which they have had strong reactions, people who have influenced them, significant experiences, intellectual interests, personal aspirations, or – more generally – topics that spring from the life of the imagination.
Finally: proofread, proofread, proofread!  Share your essays with at least one or two people who know you well – such as a parent, teacher, counselor, or friend – and ask for feedback. Remember that you ultimately have control over your essays, and your essays should retain your own voice, but others may be able to catch mistakes that you missed and help suggest areas to cut if you are over the word limit.

Extracurriculars

Your record of extracurricular experiences ideally should demonstrate a number of things:
  1. You engage your community beyond the classroom. Yale is home to over 300 student organizations, and we want to admit students who will take advantage of these resources and contribute to Yale’s vibrant extracurricular community.
  2. You take leadership positions when they are available, and you invest your energies into the activities you choose. You do not need to be president of a national organization to impress the admissions committee. But, the committee would like to see that you have spent time pursuing meaningful opportunities and that you have had a positive impact on people around you.
  3. You demonstrate a deep commitment to and genuine appreciation for what you spend your time doing. The joy you take in the pursuits that really matter to you – rather than a resume padded with a long list of activities – will strengthen your candidacy.

Interviews

Interviews are another way to help your application stand out. If you are offered the opportunity to interview, we strongly encourage you to take it. Share whatever additional information you feel the admissions committee should consider in order to fully appreciate your ideas, intellectual curiosity, character, and values.
Do not be a passive interviewee! Although the interviewer will get the ball rolling with questions, come prepared to be an engaged conversationalist. Rather than answering a question with a one-word, direct answer, approach each question as an opportunity to elaborate on various aspects of who you are. Tell your story, ask questions, and raise any concerns you may have. Interviewers can learn as much about candidates by the interesting, thoughtful questions they bring to the table as they can from the answers they give.

Recommendations

Recommendations tell us a great deal about the way you think and learn, how you contribute to your school community, and what you add to a classroom dynamic. The best recommendations are not always from the teachers in whose class you earned the highest grades, but rather from those teachers who know you best and can discuss the substance of your intellect and character. We are as interested in your intellectual curiosity and resilience as in your innate ability and work ethic. A string of generic superlatives is not as useful as a specific, thoughtful discussion of your strengths.
We prefer these letters to be from teachers who have taught you in your junior and/or senior years.  These teachers will best speak to your recent progress, your preparation for rigorous collegiate coursework, and your potential contributions beyond the classroom.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can provide broader context to some parts of your application, but they can just as often be superfluous and distracting. For example, a letter from someone who supervised your extracurricular research project may answer important questions about the work you’ve done. But a third recommendation that raves about you, just as your other letters do, will not necessarily enhance your application. In fact, it may dilute the effect of the two required recommendations.

Transcript and Testing

Your transcript is a significant part of your application. We look at your overall record, from freshman through senior years. We always remain mindful of context: what courses are available at your school? Did you take a rigorous curriculum given these course offerings? Are there patterns to your transcript that reflect on your academic potential? We rely on school profiles and guidance counselors to give us an understanding of your school and the ways in which you have been academically engaged.
We also consider your standardized test scores. Think of testing as just another part of the application, and certainly do not spend most of your weekends test-taking! Only retake a test if you feel you will significantly improve your scores. If your testing is in the right ballpark, then it probably will not be the deciding factor for your candidacy. In other words, don’t worry about about trying to get that extra twenty points. Instead, spend your time on things that will help you grow as a person: school work, extracurricular opportunities, time with friends — the things that will give you a stronger sense of yourself and, as a result, make you a stronger college applicant. (Bonus: they will also prepare you to make the most of your college experience and of life!).

Achieve good result in Supplementary Materials papers and get admissions

You should think carefully before submitting supplementary materials with your Yale College application. Most successful applicants submit only the items that we require. There are cases in which too many submissions, or submissions that do not reflect a high level of talent, can actually work against a candidate. Because the Admissions Committee gives greatest weight to the documents required of all applicants, we recommend that you focus your energy primarily on those elements of the application.
Supplementary submissions may make sense for students with substantial and well-developed talent that cannot be conveyed adequately in the rest of the application. Due to the large number of applications that Yale College receives, we cannot evaluate all supplementary materials. Admissions officers and faculty members will be selective in choosing which submissions to review.
We will accept audio recordings, musical scores, art samples, writing samples, scientific research papers, and links to personal websites. We do not encourage you to submit additional letters of recommendation, resumes, or personal essays; these are less likely to shed helpful new light on your application.

How to Submit Supplementary Materials

If you are going to submit supplementary materials, please check the appropriate box on the Yale Supplement to the Common Application, Section VI, titled "Supplementary Materials."
Supplementary materials other than art or music may be attached to the Common Application as Additional Information or mailed to our office, clearly labeled with your full legal name as it appears on your admissions application, your date of birth, the name and state or country of your high school, and the subject of the materials. Please see the sections below for more specific information about submitting art, music, academic work, and web supplements.
While we cannot accept videotapes or DVDs of performances, applicants may include a link to a website or brief YouTube video in the space indicated on the Yale Supplement to the Common Application. In all cases, applicants should review the specific instructions below to ensure that materials submitted are appropriate.

Acceptable Forms of Supplementary Materials

We will only accept submissions of art and music through our online submissions website, in .jpeg, .jpg, .tiff, .tif., .png, or .mp3 files, or, for music compositions, .pdf files. We continue to accept all other forms of supplementary materials in hard copy.
Please do not send:
  • Submissions that don’t demonstrate an unusually high level of ability.
  • Unnecessarily long or extensive submissions. Succinct submissions often make a stronger impression.
  • Three-dimensional submissions such as scrapbooks or sculpture.
  • VHS tapes, CDs, or DVDs.
  • A video addressing the admissions committee directly.
  • Personal web pages from social networking sites like Facebook or MySpace.
  • Anything that is not your own work.
Please follow these instructions rather than those on the Common Application Arts Supplement form. You do not need to submit that form to us.

Types of Supplementary Materials

  • Art
  • Music
  • Academic Work
  • Websites
  • Extra Recommendations

Supplementary Materials - Art

If you wish to submit images of your artwork as a supplement to your application, you must do so at our online supplementary materials submissions website by the appropriate application deadline (November 1 for Single-Choice Early Action candidates; December 31 for Regular Decision candidates; March 1 for transfer candidates).
Here are some additional guidelines:
  • Submit no more than ten images of your work that demonstrate the fullest possible range of your talents. Try to ensure that your technical and expressive abilities are equally represented. You are encouraged to include images of your drawings.
  • When uploading individual files onto the supplementary materials website, please indicate the title, medium, size, and date of the work in the space provided. Also indicate if the work was done from life. (For example, "Girl with a Pearl Earring, Oil on Canvas, 17.5" X 15", 1665. Painted from life.").
  • The materials must be in .jpeg, .jpg, .tiff, .tif, or .png file format.
  • Resolution of . jpeg, .jpg, .tiff, .tif, or .png images should not exceed 768 pixels in height and 1024 pixels in width.
  • To submit artwork, please check the appropriate box in Section VI of the Yale Supplement to the Common Application, titled "Supplementary Material."

Supplementary Materials - Music

Yale College does not conduct musical auditions for applicants. Music faculty members will review selected audio recordings or scores from advanced musicians, whether or not they wish to major in music as undergraduates. Please consider sending musical materials only if your accomplishments are truly outstanding for a high school musician and if your playing or composing is a strong and important part of your application. Submissions that demonstrate an average or merely competent level of ability for a high school musician will not help your application.
If you wish to submit audio recordings as a supplement to your application, you must do so at our online supplementary materials submissions website by the appropriate application deadline (November 1 for Single-Choice Early Action candidates; December 31 for Regular Decision candidates; March 1 for transfer candidates).
Here are some additional guidelines:
  • Submissions from instrumentalists and vocalists should consist of two or three pieces of contrasting styles (e.g. Baroque, Classical, Romantic, Modern) that demonstrate abilities in the areas of tone, technique, and interpretation. Singers should submit at least one piece in a foreign language. Do not present selections from method books. Whole pieces or movements (as opposed to excerpts) are preferred.
  • Submissions from composers should contain scores and matching recordings.
  • Audio materials must be in .mp3 file format. Musical scores must be in .pdf file format.
  • Submissions of recordings and scores of popular music or jazz at a high level are welcome.
  • Although your recording need not be of professional quality it should be sufficiently clear of distracting interference to enable the evaluator to arrive at a judgment. Live recordings from recitals or performances are fine so long as the quality is high enough to discern the applicant’s musical abilities. Scores must be neat and legible.
  • When uploading individual files onto the supplementary materials website, please indicate the title and composer of each submission, including movements, in the space provided. (For example, "Piano Sonata No. 2 in B flat minor, Op. 35, Scherzo. Frederic Chopin.").
  • To submit recordings or scores, please check the appropriate box in Section VI of the Yale Supplement to the Common Application, titled "Supplementary Materials."

Supplementary Materials - Academic Work

If you have been engaged in advanced scientific research, you should consider requesting a letter of recommendation from a research mentor who has been involved personally with your scientific work. The letter should be sent to us directly from the mentor and include your full, legal name as it appears in your application and the name and state or country of your high school. If your research incorporated work from many individuals, or was part of a larger project, please indicate what specific contributions you made to the project. If you contributed to a paper on the work, you may also submit a research abstract or a full paper for possible review by a member of Yale’s science faculty. Full papers are generally more useful than abstracts.
Creative writers with very well developed talents may submit their work for review. Some students have been recognized at a regional or national level and many have successfully pursued writing opportunities beyond their English classes and school literary magazines. If you are thinking about submitting extra writing samples, you might consider sending a carefully chosen short piece rather than a long manuscript. Bear in mind that the required application essays are the most important “writing samples" in an admissions file.
All supplementary academic work and recommendations should either be attached to the Common Application as Additional Information, or be mailed to the admissions office. The materials must be labeled with your full, legal name as it appears on your admissions application, your date of birth, the name and state or country of your high school, and the subject of the materials.
To submit supplementary academic work, please check the appropriate box in Section VI of the Yale Supplement to the Common Application, titled "Supplementary Material."

Supplementary Materials - Websites

Students with a high level of talent that is best conveyed through a website or a YouTube video may submit a URL on Section VI on the Yale Supplement. This is an opportunity to showcase talents or abilities not covered in the categories above; this is not a forum to address the admissions committee directly. Online videos will be judged on substance rather than production value and should be brief. Please don’t send blogs, journals, or links to social networking sites like Facebook or MySpace. These will not be considered.

Supplementary Materials - Extra Recommendations

If you feel the need to submit extra information, you may ask one additional recommender to write on your behalf. Please do not solicit this additional letter unless you feel it will add substantially to your application. The writer should know you well personally or have mentored you closely in some capacity. Please ask that person to include the following at the top of their letter: your full, legal name as it appears in your application, the name and location of your high school, and your date of birth. The letter should be labeled "Supplementary" to avoid confusion.
If you have been engaged in advanced scientific research, you should consider requesting a letter of recommendation from a research mentor who has been involved personally with your scientific work.

Admission of students of supplementry result 2012 in university

Measures currently being taken to treat disability (e.g. medication, therapy)
Please outline any medication the student is taking and any possible side-effects. If the student
is undertaking any therapies please outline these and time required to participate.
What recommendations would you make for reasonable adjustments to enable equal
participation in Higher Education (e.g. examination accommodations, adaptive
equipment etc.)?
Please indicate any reasonable accommodations that that you consider necessary for the
student to participate effectively in Higher Education (e.g. extra time in examinations, use of
assistive technology etc.)
REPORTS FROM EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGISTS
Each year a large number of applications are assessed as ineligible, as documentation is either
incomplete, inappropriate or insufficient. To assist applicants in gathering correct
documentation, an Educational Psychologist’s report should contain the following core
components. Reports must be no older than 3 years by the 1 February in the year of
application to the CAO.
1. Cover sheet, including the student's name, date of birth, age at assessment, date of
assessment, university attended, degree course and year of course. Assessments should
be no more than three years old.
2. Introduction. Referral information; family, developmental and educational history; any
relevant medical information and the student's perceptions of his/her difficulties. Any
previous assessments should be summarised. Where English is spoken as a second or
additional language, details of the student's language history and current levels of
competence should be included.
3. Test behaviour, i.e. behaviour during the assessment that may have affected the results.
4. General Level of Intellectual Ability. Measures of verbal and non-verbal ability should be
reported. Students' profiles of scores should be discussed, with particular reference to any
significant discrepancies between verbal and non-verbal ability. Results should be reported
in both standard scores and percentile points. Age equivalent scores are not sufficient.
Tests should be age appropriate as described by the test publisher.
5. Cognitive Processing, including working memory, phonological processing and speed of
processing. A full IQ test (WAIS III UK, or WISC IV) will have been administered and
reported in the previous section, so some of these aspects may have been covered.
Performance in other tests, such as numeracy, motor control and/or attentional functioning,
may be included. Tests should be age appropriate as described by the test publisher. For
example, where the limit of a test is set at 16.11 years, the applicant should be no older than
this age when the test is administered.
6. Attainments in Literacy, including single word reading, non-word reading, text reading and
reading comprehension. Results should cover qualitative analysis of errors, evidence of
strategies being used, fluency, reading speed and ability to extract information from text.
Information about spelling will come from a graded spelling test and from a piece of free
writing, which will also yield information about ability to write grammatically, the complexity
of sentence structures, the coherence of writing, use of vocabulary, writing speed and
legibility of handwriting. Results should be reported in both standard scores and percentile
points. Age equivalent scores are not sufficient. Tests should be age appropriate as
described by the test publisher. For example, where the limit of a test is set at 16.11 years,
the applicant should be no older than this age when the test is administered.
7. Attainments in Arithmetic, should be included if the student will have any mathematical
content in their course of study.
8. Attainments in Language, and if the student will have difficulty studying a modern
continental language.
9. Conclusion. It should be stated whether or not the student has an SpLD and whether their
condition is disabling in the context of studying at Third level. The effects of SpLD on the
students' literacy and study skills should be outlined, taking account of compensatory
strengths.
10. Recommended Support. As students are likely to have an Assessment of Need it is not
necessary or appropriate to make detailed recommendations about technical support. A
brief statement about the type of support which might help the student should be made here,
particularly in relation to study skills tuition.
11. Appendix, including a list of tests used in the assessment (with references) and scores
achieved in the tests.
12. Summary.
A list of suitable tests is available from:
http://www.texticweb.com/patoss/downloads/STEC_DfESGuidelines_200708.pdf
Reports are only acceptable where they have been provided by qualified psychologists; this
does not include educational consultants or specialist teachers.
An educational psychologist would normally be expected to hold:
· a primary degree in psychology at Honours level, which is recognised by the PSI
· a teaching qualification
· professional training in educational psychology, preferably at Masters level.
Summary of Evidence of a Specific Learning Difficulty
You are strongly advised to review the contents of your report to ensure that it meets the above
criteria. If the information outlined above is not available in the psycho-educational assessment,
applicants should contact the report author and request any missing information.
To assist you in obtaining additional or missing details, a Summary of Evidence of Specific
Learning Difficulty form is available below. This document should be forwarded to the
educational psychologist for completion, and should be attached to your application.
Summary of Evidence of Specific Learning Difficulty
Name of Psychologist
Title
Address
Contact Details
Qualifications
Name of Student
Institution Attending
Home Address
Contact Details
Specific Learning
Difficulty
Cognitive profile:
Test used:
Processing Speed Psychomotor Speed
Auditory Processing Visual Processing
Visual Short-Term
Memory
Auditory Short-Term
Memory
Long-Term Memory Working memory
Receptive Language Expressive
Language
Visual-Motor
Coordination
Vocabulary
Coordination
(fine/gross)
Perceptual
Organisation
Other
Literacy and numeracy
attainments:
Tests used:
Reading
Comprehension
Reading Accuracy
Reading Speed Spelling
Reading Accuracy Writing Speed
Numerical
Operations
Written expression
Phonological
Processing
Handwriting
Other Other
Signature and stamp of Psychologist
CONTACT DETAILS FOR DISABILITY SUPPORT SERVICES
Dublin City University - Disability & Learning Support Service
Tel: 01-700 5927
Email: disability.service@dcu.ie
Admissions Policy Information for students with disabilities – web link:
http://www.dcu.ie/students/disability/applying.shtml
Eligibility criteria: Students are deemed eligible for inclusion in the supplementary admissions
procedure for students with disabilities if the following criteria are met:
· a completed CAO Supplementary Information form is returned to the CAO
· specific disability documentation provided is deemed acceptable.
· students must meet University Minimum Entry Requirements (Grade C3 in TWO
Higher Level subjects and Grade D3 in FOUR Ordinary or Higher Level subjects
including Maths and English or Irish) and meet the course requirements.
· Achieve minimum 300 points - It must be noted that these are minimum entry
requirements and students cannot always be guaranteed entry at this level for
high demand courses
· where demand for places exceeds the number of places available, places are
awarded on merit
.
Trinity College Dublin - Disability Service
Phone – 01-896 3111
Email – disab@tcd.ie
Admissions Policy information for students with disabilities – web link:
http://www.tcd.ie/Admissions/undergraduate/apply/eu/disability/
Eligibility criteria: Students are deemed eligible for inclusion in the supplementary admissions
procedure for students with disabilities if the following criteria are met:
· a completed CAO Supplementary Information form is returned to the CAO
· specific disability documentation provided is deemed acceptable.
· students must matriculate (three honours and three passes, six Leaving
Certificate subjects, including English, Mathematics and one other modern
language) and meet the course requirements and be above the minimum entry
levels
· where demand for places exceeds the number of places available, places are
awarded on merit
University College Dublin - Disability Support Service
Phone: 01 716 7565 E-Mail: dss@ucd.ie
Admissions Policy information for students with disabilities – web link:
http://www.ucd.ie/access/downloads/Pre%20Entry%20Handbook.pdf
Eligibility Criteria:
· If you have enough points and have the matriculation requirements for your chosen
programme, you will receive a place on that course in line with CAO procedures.
· If you didn’t get enough points for your chosen programme you can become eligible for
inclusion in the supplementary admissions procedure if
· you return your Supplementary Information Form on time and in full to the CAO,
· Late applications or applications without an up-to-date (no more than three years old)
consultant’s/educational psychologist’s report are not considered. Check www.cao.ie if you
have any questions.
· Your Supplementary Information Form is reviewed carefully using strict guidelines.
· Applicants must matriculate and meet the course requirements to be considered for
admissions to all programmes.
· If you have any exemptions to matriculation, like a foreign language waiver, you need to
contact the NUI Registrar at registrar@nui.ie
University of Limerick - Disability Support Service
Phone: 061 202346 E-Mail: Disabilityservices@ul.ie Text: 086 0487825
Admissions Policy information for students with disabilities – web link:
http://www.ul.ie/disabilityservices/Admissions
Eligibility criteria: Students are deemed eligible for inclusion in the supplementary admissions
procedure for students with disabilities if the following criteria are met:
Eligibility Criteria:
· If you didn’t get enough points for your chosen programme you can become
eligible for inclusion in the supplementary admissions procedure if
· a completed CAO Supplementary Information form is returned to the CAO
· specific disability documentation provided is deemed acceptable.
· your Supplementary Information Form is reviewed carefully using strict
guidelines.
· you must meet University Minimum Entry Requirements (Grade C3 in TWO
Higher Level subjects and Grade D3 in FOUR Ordinary or Higher Level subjects
including Maths or another language and English) and any relevant specific
programme requirements. Where there is no specific maths requirement
foundation level maths is acceptable in fulfilling general - minimum entry
requirements, except for Nursing Programmes

ensure you can be considered eligible for the supplementary admission route.

It is important to complete the on-line form correctly and include all relevant information so that
the participating HEIs can assess this information (see sample forms on the download section of
the CAO website). In addition, medical evidence and/or education psychological reports should
be provided and should contain specific information as per guidance notes below.
MEDICAL EVIDENCE FORM
Applications will not be considered if the following conditions are not adhered to:
· A relevant Medical Consultant/Specialist who has the training and experience with the
particular condition/disability must complete this form.
· This form must be stamped or include a business card/headed paper
· All applicants must complete this form, with the exception of those with Specific Learning
Difficulties (e.g. Dyslexia), who must provide a recent Educational Psychologist’s report
· Evidence from a General Practitioner/family doctor, or support organisation is not
accepted as verification of disability.
Guidance notes for Consultants on completing the Medical Evidence Form
Please ensure that the Medical Consultant/Specialist adheres to the following guidelines when
completing the Medical Evidence Form.
Please briefly describe the course of the condition:
The first question enquires about the likely course the disability/condition might take over the
period of study. Some disabilities/conditions are static and the student will remain at the stage
at which they present for the duration of their study. Other disabilities/conditions may remain
the same, may have periods of relapse and remission, or may deteriorate. Other
disabilities/conditions are progressive with the student requiring greater support as their studies
progress.
How does the disability/medical condition impact on the students’ ability to study and
participate (e.g. fatigue, concentration, pain etc)?
The second question looks at the impact of the disability/medical condition. Please describe the
possible impact the disability/medical condition might have on the student’s ability to carry out
their studies such as:
· Mobility hampered by weakness
· Loss of dexterity
· Inability to control specific movements – steps/stairs could be a problem)
· Pain that makes everyday activities difficult
· Tremors – difficulty writing, holding, manipulating objects
· Fatigue and weakness leading to problems completing exams/lectures
· Difficulty carrying books/props etc for class
· Difficulty reading books, seeing presentations, writing due to visual problems

Appy after supplymentry result Students with Specific Learning Difficulties (SpLD)

below. Criteria used to determine levels of disadvantage are consistent with Department of
Education and Science guidelines for Irish Language Exemption and State Examinations
Commission Reasonable Accommodations in Examinations (RACE). The level of disadvantage
is deemed most significant degree where:
· Literacy attainment at or below 10th percentile/SS 81, significant discrepancy with
general ability; two literacy abilities affected. Evidence of deficits in working memory and
processing speed.
· Significant level of difficulty experienced by the student, with little or no compensatory
strategies in place. Student is unaware of strengths and weaknesses and is struggling to
a significant degree to cope with workload.
· Severe impact on ability to succeed. Student may or may not have received specialist
tuition but it has been relatively ineffective. Student’s written work not reflective of
underlying cognitive ability to a significant degree.

Tell Your Roll No.

 

Most Reading

Tags